Monday, March 31, 2008

Cushion Cut Diamond Engagement Ring

Cushion cut diamond battle ring in the aged years was named pillow cut. For this type as its name suggest, resembles that of a plump shock absorber or pillow. This cut come ups in assortments of proportions. They could either be oval, square or rectangular with rounded corners.

This type of cut gained popularity in the latter portion of the 1800's until the early 1900's. Before the dawning of electrical bulbs, shock absorber cut diamond ring was also referred to as candle flame diamond because it was said to be most superb in candlelight.

In the modern twenty-four hours setting, shock absorber cut diamond battle rings are more than symmetrical than its aged contemporaries, mainly owed to the coming of modern polishes and upgraded lapidarist skills. Though this may be the case, couples prefer aged versions of shock absorber cuts and still seeks for this sort in the old-timer or vintage market.

These type of battle rings work best as option for couples who prefer traditional, elusive designs. Shock Absorber cut diamond battle rings are still rare in modern rings.

Cushion cuts are best in solitaires, the sort that draw the attending to the gemstone located at the centre of the ring. Many women however, prefer little speech pattern rocks incorporated in the ring.

A shock absorber cut diamond ring have about 60 facets; this is 20 or more than aspects less than the modern rings. Aspect mentions to the smooth, polished airplanes that do up a stone's surface. With lesser figure of aspects as compared to fancy forms and signature cuts, it exhibits lesser brilliance.

But this characteristic, precisely adds to its alone entreaty that sets the shock absorber cut diamond ring apart from its modern coevals for it supplies a certain depth to the diamonds, allowing a individual to see through it - telling its unpretentious beauty.

The adjacent clip you ask for your spouse for a romanticist candle flame dinner; see a shock absorber cut diamond battle ring to travel with it?

Labels: , ,

0 Comments:

Post a Comment

<< Home